EssayPal.ai - This AI writes in your style of writing!

Rate My Courses

See reviews, get advice and find helpful resources for university courses

Search

Recent Reviews

1

Class Ratings

1Awful Class
2Hard
2Boring
3Kinda Useful

Professor Rating

1Awful Prof

Prof: Nah / Fall 2025

Dec 28, 2025

Comments on the course

It is 2025 and this course is based in windows 7 which ended support in January 2020. The fundamental problem with this course is that it being taught by the people who chose a text book based on windows 7. This is basic hardware stuff and having access to a lab should be a fun learning activity. Instead it is drudgery completing pointless labs in an outdated os and no one knows why or can communicate any expected learning objectives. This is a basic tech intro class. When I look online I see high schools and colleges around the world teach this material without teaching outdated operating systems. Skip this class and find some place else or get a cert. or watch you tube videos for a month. This class is a waste

School: Washtenaw CCCourse: CST 160Delivery: In personGrade: Rather not sayWorkload: HeavyTextbook Use: Yes
Quiz Heavy
1

Class Ratings

4Good Class
4Easy
4Interesting
4Useful

Professor Rating

4Good Prof

Prof: Ana Tomljenovic-berube / Fall 2025

Dec 28, 2025

Comments on the course

The course is helpful and fun, but the grading system is not good at all

Course Content

The content is mainly differnt lab techniques and experiments, which you will use to write lap reports.

Comments on the professor

The professor is nice and explains things well.

Advice

The grading system is terrible, if you do everything you need for a 12 but get less than 80 for example on the lab test, you get less. The grades other than the lab test is pass/fail, but honestly normal grading would have been better and more fair. If you don't need this course tho, I would still recomend doing it because it helps you with lab and research information.

School: McMasterCourse: LIFESCI 2L03Delivery: HybridGrade: A-Workload: LightTextbook Use: No
Participation HeavyExam Heavy
1

Class Ratings

2Bad Class
3Avg. Difficulty
4Interesting
2Barely Useful

Professor Rating

1Awful Prof

Prof: Janet Pritchard / Fall 2025

Dec 28, 2025

Comments on the course

The content itself isn't bad, but the grading and overall way this course was made was terrible. If you took foods class in highschool it shouldn't be that bad, but again, the midterms and exams are poorly worded, a lot of students failed it creating a bifocal distribution of the results which the professor didn't consider assuming all the students who failed did not attend the classes.

Course Content

The course content is interesting if you like nutrition content. Its heavy though, so you will need to memorize a lot of things including the results/ summaries of the graphs shown. Also attend the classes to sp you can write all the content on the slides since they aren't fully written.

Comments on the professor

The professor seems chill, her midterm and exam wording isn't the best though.

Advice

Make sure this course is something you need so you dont waste time or money on it.

School: McMasterCourse: LIFESCI 2N03Delivery: In personGrade: B+Workload: HeavyTextbook Use: Yes
Attendance HeavyParticipation HeavyAssignment HeavyExam Heavy