Overall, this class was engaging and enjoyable because it focused on creative thinking, a topic that feels relevant and beneficial in both academic and real-world applications. The course content left a lasting impression, much like a delicious steak that satisfies and leaves you thinking about it long after the meal. The lessons were thoughtfully designed to foster creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving, making the class a truly enriching experience. It stood out compared to other 100-level courses because it felt meaningful and impactful.

The course included a mix of quizzes, assignments, and hands-on activities, which made the learning process dynamic and engaging. The midterm interview, based on the class topic (which changes every semester), was a unique and practical way to apply what we had learned. This approach not only reinforced the course concepts but also allowed for real-world connections, which were incredibly useful. The variety of assessments ensured that students were consistently involved and challenged throughout the semester, keeping the material fresh and interesting.

The professor was highly supportive and attentive. She actively engaged with students by replying to questions on discussion posts, which created a helpful and collaborative learning environment. Additionally, the weekly meetings on Tuesdays were a great way to stay connected and clarify any doubts in real time. A major strength of the course was the clear rubrics provided for almost every assignment, which were easy to find in the rubric section and helped set clear expectations for success. However, one downside was that the workload, while valuable, often felt time-consuming and demanding for a 100-level course. Some assignments required hours of effort, which could be overwhelming, especially for students juggling multiple classes. Balancing the creative and engaging activities with s...read more

Before taking this class, I wish I knew that while the course was engaging and beneficial, some of the assignments and activities could take several hours to complete, which can feel demanding for a 100-level course. Additionally, I didn’t realize that there were in-person class meetings as well, which met once or twice a week for 2-3 hours, alongside the online asynchronous section. This setup could be useful for students who prefer face-to-face interactions, but it’s good to plan accordingly. It’s also helpful to know that grading is based on the rubric, and the professor grades fairly without being overly strict. Understanding how the grading works and where to find the rubrics makes it easier to meet expectations and succeed in the course. Knowing these things ahead of time would have...read more